<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dofollow Vs. Nofollow comments &#8211; fighting spam and rewarding commenters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/</link>
	<description>The Science of Web Art, Design and Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 05:02:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brady Crabb</title>
		<link>http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/comment-page-1/#comment-2189</link>
		<dc:creator>Brady Crabb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/#comment-2189</guid>
		<description>I agree that turning off nofollow does mean extra work, in the form of moderating your comment stream, but I think it is worth it.  Having several blogs myself, I have enabled follow on all but one, which I don&#039;t allow comments on, simply because it is an information-only site, so comments aren&#039;t needed.

I have had a few that have tried to spam a couple of my blogs. Nice thing with newer versions of WordPress, you can click on the ip address in the comment to catch what I like to call &quot;frequent spammers.&quot;  This stops their fun really quick.

I think that the statistical increase in comments spam can be tied to the growth in the Internet as a whole.  More people means more traffic - both good and bad. Most of us comment because we want to join in on the conversation - this way everyone wins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that turning off nofollow does mean extra work, in the form of moderating your comment stream, but I think it is worth it.  Having several blogs myself, I have enabled follow on all but one, which I don&#8217;t allow comments on, simply because it is an information-only site, so comments aren&#8217;t needed.</p>
<p>I have had a few that have tried to spam a couple of my blogs. Nice thing with newer versions of WordPress, you can click on the ip address in the comment to catch what I like to call &#8220;frequent spammers.&#8221;  This stops their fun really quick.</p>
<p>I think that the statistical increase in comments spam can be tied to the growth in the Internet as a whole.  More people means more traffic &#8211; both good and bad. Most of us comment because we want to join in on the conversation &#8211; this way everyone wins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guilherme Zühlke O'Connor</title>
		<link>http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/comment-page-1/#comment-2097</link>
		<dc:creator>Guilherme Zühlke O'Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/#comment-2097</guid>
		<description>Well, this intiative is a but old now, I disabled nofollow more than a year ago. I did notice some increase but it wasn&#039;t a huge one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, this intiative is a but old now, I disabled nofollow more than a year ago. I did notice some increase but it wasn&#8217;t a huge one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bee Control</title>
		<link>http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/comment-page-1/#comment-2096</link>
		<dc:creator>Bee Control</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/#comment-2096</guid>
		<description>Have you seen increase in traffic since allowing dofollow?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you seen increase in traffic since allowing dofollow?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris @ Nozio.com</title>
		<link>http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/comment-page-1/#comment-2014</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris @ Nozio.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/#comment-2014</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You are spot on! Quality content should always be rewarded, I think in time the major search engines will work to that goal, maybe with a selective &#039;nofollow&#039; (ie even with a nofollow the link could be counted if the other site is in a good neighborhood/as trusted content.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are spot on! Quality content should always be rewarded, I think in time the major search engines will work to that goal, maybe with a selective &#8216;nofollow&#8217; (ie even with a nofollow the link could be counted if the other site is in a good neighborhood/as trusted content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarbleHost.com</title>
		<link>http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/comment-page-1/#comment-1977</link>
		<dc:creator>MarbleHost.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/#comment-1977</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The do-follow movement that you talk about seems to quickly get turned off though.  It&#039;s the automated spam bots that just troll for this type of site gets me somewhat disillusioned with this whole scenario.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I had enabled &quot;dofollow&quot; on one of my blogs, only to wake up the next morning to find over 800 entries to moderate, with more and more coming each day.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>The do-follow movement that you talk about seems to quickly get turned off though.  It&#8217;s the automated spam bots that just troll for this type of site gets me somewhat disillusioned with this whole scenario.</p>
<p>I had enabled &#8220;dofollow&#8221; on one of my blogs, only to wake up the next morning to find over 800 entries to moderate, with more and more coming each day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Follows</title>
		<link>http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/comment-page-1/#comment-1861</link>
		<dc:creator>John Follows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/#comment-1861</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;We definitely have nofollow turned off on our blog.  Of course we are a do follow search engine, so we may be a little biased.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We definitely have nofollow turned off on our blog.  Of course we are a do follow search engine, so we may be a little biased.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogger Tips</title>
		<link>http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/comment-page-1/#comment-1833</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogger Tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 07:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/#comment-1833</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I just posted some new &lt;a href=&quot;http://themonetizedblogger.com/2009/01/blog-design/u-comment-i-follow-icons/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Free U Comment I Follow Buttons &amp; Badges&lt;/a&gt; on my blog for anyone who wants a dofollow badge that&#039;s a little more Web 2.0&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just posted some new <a href="http://themonetizedblogger.com/2009/01/blog-design/u-comment-i-follow-icons/">Free U Comment I Follow Buttons &amp; Badges</a> on my blog for anyone who wants a dofollow badge that&#8217;s a little more Web 2.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The NoFollow vs. DoFollow Debate &#124; Jeff Flowers.com</title>
		<link>http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/comment-page-1/#comment-1077</link>
		<dc:creator>The NoFollow vs. DoFollow Debate &#124; Jeff Flowers.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/#comment-1077</guid>
		<description>[...] The Ultimate List of DoFollow Plugins » Comprehensive Reference for WordPress DoFollow Plugins » DoFollow: Fighting Spam or Rewarding Commenters? » Does DoFollow Increase Your [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Ultimate List of DoFollow Plugins » Comprehensive Reference for WordPress DoFollow Plugins » DoFollow: Fighting Spam or Rewarding Commenters? » Does DoFollow Increase Your [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guioconnor</title>
		<link>http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/comment-page-1/#comment-850</link>
		<dc:creator>guioconnor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/#comment-850</guid>
		<description>@Jim - Thanks for the correction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jim &#8211; Thanks for the correction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/comment-page-1/#comment-847</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 07:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/#comment-847</guid>
		<description>The only problem with your article is that NoFollow has absolutely nothing to do with fighting SPAM. Google wants you to use it to fight ad-filled sites from gaming their search algos, thereby getting higher results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only problem with your article is that NoFollow has absolutely nothing to do with fighting SPAM. Google wants you to use it to fight ad-filled sites from gaming their search algos, thereby getting higher results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guioconnor</title>
		<link>http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/comment-page-1/#comment-644</link>
		<dc:creator>guioconnor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/#comment-644</guid>
		<description>@pelf - &lt;blockquote&gt;That way, I am sure that the particular commentator is not only a passer-by (...) And I save a lot of time moderating comments! :)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hi Pelf,

Before turning off nofollow on this site I have considered several options and the linklove plugin was one of these.

I turned it down because of two reasons:

Passer-by commenters that have made relevant comments deserve a link as much as those who comment every post, everyone will have one link for each comment, so still it is fair with habitual commenters.
Once a bot is faster than a human to leave a comment, force them to put a certain number won&#039;t stop them from spanning me, they would just do it more. I already had spam comments before the do-follow option so, nofollow doesn&#039;t seem to stop them buy any measure.


I decided to moderate comments because as I put a lot of time and effort to write the posts, I thought it would be a fair investment to spend a little more and don&#039;t allow people (and bots, of course :-) to ruin that up.

Not everyone can do it, of course. Sometimes the effort is just too big, but it has worked for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@pelf &#8211;<br />
<blockquote>That way, I am sure that the particular commentator is not only a passer-by (&#8230;) And I save a lot of time moderating comments! :)</p></blockquote>
<p>Hi Pelf,</p>
<p>Before turning off nofollow on this site I have considered several options and the linklove plugin was one of these.</p>
<p>I turned it down because of two reasons:</p>
<p>Passer-by commenters that have made relevant comments deserve a link as much as those who comment every post, everyone will have one link for each comment, so still it is fair with habitual commenters.<br />
Once a bot is faster than a human to leave a comment, force them to put a certain number won&#8217;t stop them from spanning me, they would just do it more. I already had spam comments before the do-follow option so, nofollow doesn&#8217;t seem to stop them buy any measure.</p>
<p>I decided to moderate comments because as I put a lot of time and effort to write the posts, I thought it would be a fair investment to spend a little more and don&#8217;t allow people (and bots, of course :-) to ruin that up.</p>
<p>Not everyone can do it, of course. Sometimes the effort is just too big, but it has worked for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pelf</title>
		<link>http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/comment-page-1/#comment-640</link>
		<dc:creator>pelf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 09:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/#comment-640</guid>
		<description>I have recently activated a Link Love plugin that removes the &quot;nofollow&quot; tag after x number of comments. That way, I am sure that the particular commentator is not only a passer-by but is somebody who contributes to the discussions on my blog. And I save a lot of time moderating comments! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have recently activated a Link Love plugin that removes the &#8220;nofollow&#8221; tag after x number of comments. That way, I am sure that the particular commentator is not only a passer-by but is somebody who contributes to the discussions on my blog. And I save a lot of time moderating comments! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guioconnor</title>
		<link>http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/comment-page-1/#comment-628</link>
		<dc:creator>guioconnor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/#comment-628</guid>
		<description>@Mitchell Allen - Hi Mitchell, welcome to our discussion.

&lt;blockquote&gt;I wonder if the day is not far off when search engine traffic is dwarfed by social networking?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That would be like returning to the old times of paper publishing, but with the reach of internet for your content. Sounds interesting :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mitchell Allen &#8211; Hi Mitchell, welcome to our discussion.</p>
<blockquote><p>I wonder if the day is not far off when search engine traffic is dwarfed by social networking?</p></blockquote>
<p>That would be like returning to the old times of paper publishing, but with the reach of internet for your content. Sounds interesting :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitchell Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/comment-page-1/#comment-625</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitchell Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 00:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/#comment-625</guid>
		<description>Okay, this makes sense. I was following the conversation on AuthorityBlogger (which is how I found your blog). 

I had been reading about the so-called dofollow movement, and I can see the merit of it.

I wonder if the day is not far off when search engine traffic is dwarfed by social networking?

Cheers,

Mitch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, this makes sense. I was following the conversation on AuthorityBlogger (which is how I found your blog). </p>
<p>I had been reading about the so-called dofollow movement, and I can see the merit of it.</p>
<p>I wonder if the day is not far off when search engine traffic is dwarfed by social networking?</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Mitch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guioconnor</title>
		<link>http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/comment-page-1/#comment-595</link>
		<dc:creator>guioconnor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/#comment-595</guid>
		<description>@Deceth - &lt;blockquote&gt;I think rewarding valid comments is definitely a good idea. Whether you use nofollow or not, you will get spammed. Lots of spammers or looking not only for generating links, but just putting tons of links out there to get traffic.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I definetely agree with you. In my opinion there is only one ultimate solution to end spam: Manual moderation.

I know this sounds utopia when you think at enterpreneur probloggers with many blogs to take care: automation is needed. It is easier for an modest authority blogger like me.

Anyway, I think if one can afford to that, one should.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Deceth &#8211;<br />
<blockquote>I think rewarding valid comments is definitely a good idea. Whether you use nofollow or not, you will get spammed. Lots of spammers or looking not only for generating links, but just putting tons of links out there to get traffic.</p></blockquote>
<p>I definetely agree with you. In my opinion there is only one ultimate solution to end spam: Manual moderation.</p>
<p>I know this sounds utopia when you think at enterpreneur probloggers with many blogs to take care: automation is needed. It is easier for an modest authority blogger like me.</p>
<p>Anyway, I think if one can afford to that, one should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deceth</title>
		<link>http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/comment-page-1/#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator>Deceth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/#comment-594</guid>
		<description>I think rewarding valid comments is definitely a good idea. Whether you use nofollow or not, you will get spammed. Lots of spammers or looking not only for generating links, but just putting tons of links out there to get traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think rewarding valid comments is definitely a good idea. Whether you use nofollow or not, you will get spammed. Lots of spammers or looking not only for generating links, but just putting tons of links out there to get traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guioconnor</title>
		<link>http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/comment-page-1/#comment-585</link>
		<dc:creator>guioconnor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 18:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/#comment-585</guid>
		<description>@tap - &lt;blockquote&gt;Great post, I totally agree. Please update on this, have you seen a huge increase in spam?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Actually, I haven&#039;t seen much more spam than the usual, but I also haven&#039;t seen a big increase on valid comments as well.

It is true that my main motivation was to reward my commenters, but I&#039;d also be glad to see more (legit) comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@tap &#8211;<br />
<blockquote>Great post, I totally agree. Please update on this, have you seen a huge increase in spam?</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually, I haven&#8217;t seen much more spam than the usual, but I also haven&#8217;t seen a big increase on valid comments as well.</p>
<p>It is true that my main motivation was to reward my commenters, but I&#8217;d also be glad to see more (legit) comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tap</title>
		<link>http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/comment-page-1/#comment-584</link>
		<dc:creator>tap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 15:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/#comment-584</guid>
		<description>Great post, I totally agree. Please update on this, have you seen a huge increase in spam?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, I totally agree. Please update on this, have you seen a huge increase in spam?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guioconnor</title>
		<link>http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/comment-page-1/#comment-519</link>
		<dc:creator>guioconnor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/#comment-519</guid>
		<description>@mlankton - Ok, I will! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mlankton &#8211; Ok, I will! :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mlankton</title>
		<link>http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/comment-page-1/#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator>mlankton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 03:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.z-oc.com/blog/2007/09/dofollow-vs-nofollow-comments-fighting-spam-and-rewarding-commenters/#comment-518</guid>
		<description>After some time has gone by, please post how going dofollow has affected both traffic and comments.
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After some time has gone by, please post how going dofollow has affected both traffic and comments.<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
